Posts

Showing posts from October, 2020

Are we falling into the trap set up by anti-pesticide lobby by advocating agro-ecosystem analysis (AESA)-based approach for pest management?

Sometime back, I commented upon the zero budget natural farming that lets crops grow naturally with least material intervention, more particularly bereft of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. The advocates of organic farming or natural farming believe that nature balances itself over the period of time and produces enough for its inhabitants. They do recommend the decoctions of urine, cow dung, fermented products that include extracts of plants that grow in wild, plant extracts per se, often in-edible for human consumption. Unfortunately, these products have never been tested for their safety to humans and animals, nor their impact on environment talked about. Being natural, these are assumed to be safe. Of late, these products are pushed under the pretext of agro-ecological engineering or agro-ecology as a basis of crop pest management. It is well known that agro-ecology is a basis of farming, and crop resilience has limits of growth if ecological parameters are stretched far and

Language that we use

Image
  A post (related to motivational speech dated 11 Dec 2016 at Rotary Club in Chennai) I watched and shared on LinkedIn just now, urges a need to use sweet language irrespective of the circumstances or hopelessness of the meeting you are in. Why? Because, everything else that comes out of human body stinks, be it sweat, exhalation, urine, excreta, etc, etc.  Yesterday and today while watching TV programmes on the Hathras killing of a daughter of poor parents of backward class, we watched in horror the way DM explained to the parents of victim a need to side with administration and not to follow the demand for justice voiced by the media, as media will not be with them for all times. Now, spokesmen of the establishment are justifying crudeness and arrogance of police and admn, initiation of inquiry against victim’s parents, wrongful banning of movement of media which was reporting the case vehemently against all odds in the TV debates. A TV anchor of the programme I watched continued to